Last weekend, I was disappointed with my result at
the Paavo Nurmi Marathon. I was slower
than 3:30. If my goal had been to break
3:20, and I finished in 3:29, I would have been OK with that. I’d understand that it was a hot day, and my
time was good under the circumstances. I
look at 3:30 differently. It’s a line I
don’t like to cross. Regardless of the
circumstances, I divide my marathon finishes into good results and bad results. 3:30 is the dividing line.
My obsession with 3:30 evolved over time. Today, most people consider 3:30 to be a fast
time. In the early 80s, when I started
running, 3:30 was an average marathon time.
It was solidly in the middle of the pack.
When I ran my first marathon, I really didn’t know
what I was doing. I wasn’t following a
training plan. I did long training runs,
gradually building them all the way up to 26.25 miles. Other than the long runs, my training mileage
was paltry. When I started training, my
goal was 3:15. By race day, I had
revised my goal to 3:30. I was on pace for
3:30 for the first 14 miles. Then I fell
apart. I did a lot of walking in the
late miles. At some point, I told myself
I had to run the rest of the way to break four hours. I finished in 3:59:39. In training, I had run 26.25 miles in
3:44:32, so I knew I could do better than 3:59.
The following year, I ran my second marathon. My training was better, but I still didn’t
know what I was doing. I didn’t go as
far in my long runs, but I did them faster.
My mileage was still inadequate, but it was better. I started the race with a goal of 3:15. I finished in 4:05:41. One of my friends said, “Dave, what happened? I thought you were ready.” Back then, 4:05 was considered slow.
It was four years before I ran another
marathon. I followed a training plan. My training was interrupted by injuries, but
I was still better prepared. My only
goal was to finish. I finished in
3:28:20. That was a big improvement, and
for the first time, I was happy with my result.
Over the next few years, I kept improving. In 1990, I qualified for Boston with a
3:09:47 in the Seattle Marathon. Two
years later, I improved to 2:58:17 at Grandma’s Marathon. That was my second Boston qualifier. It was the only time I ever broke three
hours.
After that, I let myself get out of shape. I was going to be taking night classes for
the next few years, so I didn’t think I would have time to train for
marathons. In fact, I still ran them,
but I had to revise my goal to finishing.
I wouldn’t break 3:30 again until 1996.
By this time, I was in the 35-39 age group. To qualify for Boston in my new age group, I
needed a time of 3:15. In 1997, I lost
weight, improved my training, and ran Grandma’s Marathon in 3:14:01. I set a lifetime goal of qualifying for
Boston at least once in every age group.
Over time, I noticed that I beat 3:30 in roughly
half of my marathons. When I didn’t,
there was always a reason. Sometimes I
wasn’t in shape. Sometimes I was sick or
injured. Other times it was an unusually
difficult course or the weather conditions were harsh. Whenever I was well-prepared, healthy and the
course and conditions were reasonable, I broke 3:30.
Over the next several years, my training and fitness
varied dramatically. My weight was up
and down like a yo-yo. It was never an extreme
weight gain, but it was enough to adversely affect my times. My median marathon time never strayed too far
from 3:30. Somewhere along the way, I
set another lifetime goal. I wanted to
keep at least half of my times under 3:30.
Over time, I came to think of it as a win-loss record. Anything under 3:30 was a “win.” Anything over 3:30 was a “loss.” I wanted to have a winning record.
When I reached the 40-44 age group, I needed 3:20 to
qualify for Boston. I couldn’t run 3:20
to save my life. Three times I ran
3:21. I finally got a Boston qualifier
for my age group by running the Tucson Marathon. That course is almost all downhill. That was the only way I could qualify.
In 2005, I had a wake-up call. I was running the Mardi Gras Marathon in New
Orleans. The course was almost entirely
flat, and the weather was perfect. I
paced myself perfectly. I broke 3:30,
but just barely. I had to fight for it
all through the second half of the race.
Suddenly, even breaking 3:30 on a flat course took everything I had.
Later that year, I did my first double. I ran two marathons on the same weekend. I was working on running marathons in all 50
states. When I saw an opportunity to run
marathons in Rhode Island and Connecticut on consecutive days, I had to go for
it. I realized I would have to go
slow. I was going to have two losses. That brought my lifetime “win-loss record” to
22-24. I began the next year with
another “loss” on a hilly course at the Hogeye Marathon.
In my first 47 marathons, I qualified for Boston
only four times. Then three things
happened. First, I turned 45. Now I could qualify for Boston with a time of
3:30. Second, I finally got serious
about losing weight. In 15 weeks, I lost
15 pounds. I’m only 5’4”, so that’s a
big difference on my small frame.
Finally, I started cycling on the days I wasn’t running. It was like doubling my training
overnight. I qualified for Boston in six
consecutive races. I also started
racking up “wins.”
For five years, qualifying for Boston was almost
synonymous with breaking 3:30. The same
year I turned 50, the B.A.A. changed their qualifying standards. Qualifying for Boston and breaking 3:30
continued to be synonymous even after I turned 50.
I was pursuing various long-term goals that led me
to keep running marathons in different states.
Before long, I had qualified for Boston in half of the states. I set a new goal of qualifying in every
state. I reached that goal in January
when I finally qualified in Nevada. Now
I have two obsessions. I want to beat
3:30 whenever possible, and I want to qualify for Boston whenever possible.
Excluding ultras, I’ve done 194 marathons. My “win-loss” record is 125-69. Paavo Nurmi was a “loss” this year. Maybe 3:39 was a good time under the
conditions, but a loss is a loss. Maybe
someday, I’ll be too old to break 3:30.
Maybe someday, I’ll have to reassess what’s a “good” race. Today is not that day.
In most races, only a small percentage of the
runners are competing with each other.
Most of us are competing with ourselves.
We each have to set our own goals, whether it’s finishing, setting a new
PR, qualifying for Boston, or having fun.
My goals are no more valid than your goals. This is where I set the bar, but your mileage
may vary.
No comments:
Post a Comment