I
belong to a few running clubs that have Facebook groups. From time to time, I see a post that begins,
“I have [insert injury here]…” and
goes on to ask for advice on how to treat it.
More troubling, I also sometimes see posts like, “I’m experiencing [insert symptoms here], what do I have?”
Posts
like this usually come from runners who are new to the sport. Since some of these groups have thousands of
members, there are usually numerous responses from more experienced runners. While the responses are well-intentioned,
they’re not always helpful. They don’t necessarily
come up with the correct diagnosis. As
for treatment recommendations, they’re all over the board. I often see many different suggestions, some
of which are contradictory.
It’s
tempting to want to help. If someone has
an injury that I’ve had in the past, and I know how to treat it, I’m tempted to
offer advice. Similarly, if someone
describes the classic symptoms of a common running injury, I’m tempted to tell
them what I think it is. It’s only after
seeing all the conflicting advice posted by other runners that I realize it’s
not helpful.
In
the future, my advice will be “See a doctor.”
There
are several things a doctor can do for an injured runner. The most important is to give a correct and
definitive diagnosis. Before anyone can
come up with a good treatment plan, they need to know what they’re
treating. The first problem with seeking
medical advice from an online forum is the risk of an incorrect diagnosis. If the diagnosis is incorrect, the treatment
may be ineffective, or worst yet, harmful.
There’s no substitute for getting the correct diagnosis. The best way to do that is to see a doctor.
Collectively,
an online forum with thousands of experienced runners has a lot of
experience. The people answering
questions, however, are individuals.
Each one has limited experience.
Their answers will be biased according to their own experiences.
Let
me give an example. Suppose someone is
experiencing knee pain when they run. I
have experience with a common running injury called chondromalacia of the
patella. It’s more commonly called “runner’s
knee.” I’ve had this injury twice. I know the cause, I know the symptoms, and I
know the treatment. If I hear someone
describing knee pain, I’m going to ask myself, “Do they have runner’s knee?” If they do, I could give some helpful
advice. If they don’t, I can’t. I’m not familiar with other knee injuries, so
if the symptoms sound similar, I’m going to be biased toward assuming they have
the injury I know about. There may be
dozens of other knee conditions I know nothing about. Some may have similar symptoms. I don’t have a broad enough background to
distinguish between them.
When
you ask a question online, you’ll get multiple answers. If five people say you have runner’s knee and
five other people each suggest different injuries, you may assume that runner’s
knee is the correct answer. Why else
would so many people agree? Here’s
why. The more common the injury, the
more people in the group will know about it.
You’re likely to see a distribution of answers that corresponds with the
frequency of that injury among the population of runners. What if you have a less common injury? What if your injury wasn’t caused by
running? It may be related to a
pre-existing condition or a recent trauma.
Your online audience doesn’t know your medical history. Because of their individual biases, they’ll
sometimes get the diagnosis wrong, in spite of their vast collective
experience.
Doctors
have years of education and experience. They’re
familiar with a wide variety of different injuries, and they’re trained to be
able to differentiate between them. They
have more tools at their disposal.
Besides asking questions, they can physically examine the site of the
injury. They can also run diagnostic
tests, such as X-rays or MRIs. It’s
their job to be able to give you the correct diagnosis. They also have a professional (and legal) responsibility
to not give you a misdiagnosis. If they
can’t give you the right answer, they’ll refer you to someone else who can.
There
are a number of reasons why people ask friends (or strangers) for advice,
rather than going to a doctor. It’s
quicker, it’s easier, it’s more convenient, and it’s free. Seeing a doctor involves making an
appointment. You may have to take time
off from work. Even if you have
insurance, you probably have a copay and/or a deductible. In my experience, it’s worth both the time
and money to get a correct diagnosis.
They
second thing a doctor can do is recommend
a treatment plan. I emphasize the word
recommend, because you’re under no obligation to follow their advice.
I
suspect the main reason some runners don’t want to see a doctor is because they’re
afraid the doctor will tell them they have to stop running – not just for a few
days or a few weeks, but forever. In my
experience, the treatment may involve rest, but only for a few days or at worst
a few weeks. It’s unlikely your doctor
will tell you to give up your sport.
More importantly, if they do, you can get a second opinion. Their treatment plan is a recommendation. It’s generally a good idea to follow their
advice, since they understand your injury better that you do. It’s important to remember, however, that you
don’t have to.
The
third thing a doctor can do is educate you.
They can explain why you got injured and how to prevent the same injury from
recurring in the future. Not all doctors
do this, but the best ones do. If they
don’t, you should ask.
I’ve
been running for 34 years. I’ve
experienced many of the most common running injuries at least once. With experience, I’ve learned to distinguish
between “normal” discomfort (e.g. sore muscles after a strenuous effort) and
the symptoms of an injury. I’ve learned
to recognize the symptoms of injuries I’ve had in the past. I’ve learned how to treat them. I’ve also learned how to prevent them or
minimize my risk. Finally, I’ve learned
to recognize early warning signs, so I can treat a minor injury before it
becomes serious. Sometimes, a single
well-timed rest day is all it takes.
If
I self-diagnose an injury, it’s only because I’ve had the same injury
before. It’s easier to do that when you
know your full medical history and are personally experiencing the
symptoms. It’s much harder to diagnose
someone else. That should be left to the
medical profession.
If
I have symptoms that are unfamiliar, I’ll see a doctor. The first time I had runner’s knee, I saw a
doctor. That was 31 years ago. The second time, I diagnosed and treated it
myself. That was 30 years ago. There was never a third time. I learned how to prevent it. I’ve followed similar patterns with other
injuries. I’m currently experiencing a
mild case of Achilles tendonitis. I didn’t
see a doctor, only because I’ve had it before and was able to recognize the
symptoms. Part of my treatment is
rest. I don’t like to rest, but it’s an
investment. Resting a few days this week
will hopefully prevent me from having a longer layoff.
One other aspect: treatments change over the years. I had recurring back trouble and when I first saw a doctor in the late 1970's, I got PT and they prescribed the Williams Exercises. Now in 2013, I went back and it turns out that the McKenzie exercises that I was taught worked much better...for the condition that I have. We have more data, and without a visit to a doctor, I never would have gotten access to it.
ReplyDeleteThat's something I hadn't considered. If I've had an injury before, I think I already know how to treat it, but there may be newer, more effective treatments that I don't know about.
DeleteAgreed. I will steer clear of trying to diagnose anyone. But if a runner says they have plantar fasciitis and asks what worked for me when I had it, I will tell them. But of course, that's just what worked for ME. And it's not just injuries that runners ask other runners about, it's other medical conditions. I recently saw an online post in which a runner was asking other runners for diagnosis and advice regarding bloody urine when she runs. For goodness sake, get to a doctor, lady!
ReplyDeleteIt's hard to resist the temptation to give advice. It only recently occurred to me that if someone says they have PF (or some other injury), I shouldn't assume they're correct. If they got that diagnosis form a doctor, they should have also been told how to treat it. If they didn't, it might not be the correct diagnosis.
Delete